Print Print this article Email Email this article Link Trackback

FY 2011 Defense Budget: Bigger and Worse?

Travis | Dec 21, 2009 | there are 0 comments 0

December and January are when the Pentagon, OMB, and the White House put the finishing touches on the defense budget request for the upcoming fiscal year. These months are great because of all the leaks, misinformation, spin, and half-assed speculation that accompany the few nuggets of truly reliable information.

In what appears to be a golden nugget, Defense News last week reported that the Obama administration plans to add $100 billion to the defense budget between 2011 and 2015. This infusion of funds will mean that the defense budget will increase above and beyond the effects of inflation. In contrast, this year’s FY 2010 budget projected future spending increasing only enough to keep up with inflation.

For insight about what this spending increase might mean, Defense News TV yesterday interviewed one of the most informed, least spun, and best connected defense observers in Washington: Gordon Adams, aka “The Don Corleone of Defense Budgets.” Adams was frank about the contradiction between spending increases and acquisition reforms:

As a bottom line, you get no reform when you increase the budget…If the objective here is a real reform in acquisition, or a real reform in management, or a real reform in operations programs, you’re not going to get it when you’re increasing the budget. That’s just an iron law.

Watch it:

tags Security Matters, Defense Spending, Acquisition (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account by clicking right here. It's quick and free.

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

New START: One year later
With the anniversary of New START's entry into force, it's time for an examination of the treaty's successes, future opportunities, and the hurdles nuclear arms reductions still face, writes Kingston Reif in a new article published in the Bulletin of the ...

US weapons for future include key relics of the past
The Associated Press' Robert Burns wrote an article entitled "US weapons for future include key relics of the past" that features the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation's Laicie Olson discussing the 2013 Defense Budget....

Pentagon Budget: Forced To Diet On Only $613 Billion
The Associated Press' Robert Burns wrote an article entitled "US weapons for future include key relics of the past" that features the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation's Laicie Olson discussing the 2013 Defense Budget....

Are ambitious Life Extension Programs on Hold?
The B61 life extension program has come under increasing scrutiny. And for good reason writes Nickolas Roth in this new analysis....

Missile Defense Intercepts in Space: A problem not solved
A recent report by the Defense Science Board concludes that U.S. missile defenses are still unable to discriminate between an incoming missile and decoys or countermeasures designed to confound the system, writes Lt. Gen. Robert Gard (USA, ret.) in this n...