Print Print this article Email Email this article Link Trackback

F-22 Fight on the Hill Begins

Travis | Jun 18, 2009 | there are 0 comments 0
Who would want to kill me?

Who would want to kill me?

It's like something from a bad movie. Bill Matthews:

After more than 16 hours of squabbling over the 2010 defense budget, weary [House Armed Services] committee members voted 31-30 at 2:30 a.m. to keep the F-22 program alive by making a $369 million down payment on 12 more planes.

[snip]

The $369 million would buy advance procurement parts to begin production on a dozen new fighters. Ultimately, the planes would cost about $2.8 billion.

The advance procurement money would be taken from funds budgeted for Energy Department cleanups at nuclear weapons sites, a House aide said.

The $369 million would be a down payment on 12 new planes to be procured in fiscal year 2011 (aka next calendar year). Including this advanced procurement funding does not mean the planes will be bought - indeed, advanced F-22 procurement dollars were approved last year but HASC redirected them to F-22 modifications in FY 2010 - but it sure makes it easier. If the advanced procurement dollars pass, lawmakers will be able to say they already sunk money into the buy and that it therefore should go forward in FY 2011 so the money isn't wasted.

HASC did well to beat back attempts to restore funding for missile defense programs that don't work. It also pumped up nonproliferation dollars. But this F-22 stuff is smoke-filled, backroom hijinks. I don't think the roll call is available yet showing how members voted on the F-22 amendment, but I'll post it when I see it.

Which Democrat will have the courage to offer a floor amendment (likely next week) to knock out the extra F-22 money? Can that Democrat find a Republican friend who takes fiscal responsibility seriously even when it comes to defense?

POGO and Defense Tech have more.

tags Security Matters (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account by clicking right here. It's quick and free.

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

US weapons for future include key relics of the past
The Associated Press' Robert Burns wrote an article entitled "US weapons for future include key relics of the past" that features the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation's Laicie Olson discussing the 2013 Defense Budget....

Pentagon Budget: Forced To Diet On Only $613 Billion
The Associated Press' Robert Burns wrote an article entitled "US weapons for future include key relics of the past" that features the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation's Laicie Olson discussing the 2013 Defense Budget....

Are ambitious Life Extension Programs on Hold?
The B61 life extension program has come under increasing scrutiny. And for good reason writes Nickolas Roth in this new analysis....

Missile Defense Intercepts in Space: A problem not solved
A recent report by the Defense Science Board concludes that U.S. missile defenses are still unable to discriminate between an incoming missile and decoys or countermeasures designed to confound the system, writes Lt. Gen. Robert Gard (USA, ret.) in this n...

UNSCR 1540 & the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit: A View From Seoul
The Republic of Korea (ROK) has been and remains a staunch supporter of the global nonproliferation regime as it borders a grave security threat and proliferator of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). With the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit just months away,...