Print Print this article Email Email this article Link Trackback

Don’t Feed the Crazies

Travis | Jun 09, 2009 | there are 0 comments 0

“There is mounting evidence that the President not only identifies with Muslims, but may actually still be one himself,” Frank Gaffney wrote yesterday.

When you publish things like that, you should not be given the opportunity to express your views on serious foreign policy issues in popular forums. Gaffney ought to be disqualified from being quoted in a mainstream news source ever again. The Washington Times, Commentary, National Review, and other right-wing rags don’t count, of course. Our side publishes the less-than-credible in our partisan outlets, too.

But what about USA Today’s op-ed page? Hardball with Chris Matthews? The Boston Globe? Politico? These are widely-disseminated news sources with a responsibility to the public. You can’t feature some old white guy just because he is willing to be provocative and say destructive things.

I’m not saying the Center or I are the be-all-end-all of analysts. We make mistakes and bad calls (CSAR-X sticks in my mind). But at least we try to base our research and recommendations in reality.

Stop quoting Frank Gaffney! He is not a serious analyst. If I read one quote from him on arms control negotiations in any of the big papers this year, I will lose a grip. I’d rather see John Bolton’s name than Gaffney’s. And that's saying something.

tags Right Wing Rant (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account by clicking right here. It's quick and free.

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

New START: One year later
With the anniversary of New START's entry into force, it's time for an examination of the treaty's successes, future opportunities, and the hurdles nuclear arms reductions still face, writes Kingston Reif in a new article published in the Bulletin of the ...

US weapons for future include key relics of the past
The Associated Press' Robert Burns wrote an article entitled "US weapons for future include key relics of the past" that features the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation's Laicie Olson discussing the 2013 Defense Budget....

Pentagon Budget: Forced To Diet On Only $613 Billion
The Associated Press' Robert Burns wrote an article entitled "US weapons for future include key relics of the past" that features the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation's Laicie Olson discussing the 2013 Defense Budget....

Are ambitious Life Extension Programs on Hold?
The B61 life extension program has come under increasing scrutiny. And for good reason writes Nickolas Roth in this new analysis....

Missile Defense Intercepts in Space: A problem not solved
A recent report by the Defense Science Board concludes that U.S. missile defenses are still unable to discriminate between an incoming missile and decoys or countermeasures designed to confound the system, writes Lt. Gen. Robert Gard (USA, ret.) in this n...