Print Print this article Email Email this article Link Trackback

Arms Control and The Kids

Travis | Jul 30, 2009 | there are 4 comments 4

Over at World Politics Review, friend-of-NOH Johan Bergenäs takes a look at youth involvement in arms control and nonproliferation. The article makes a nice companion piece to Adam Waxman’s article last year in WireTap.

The Kids come up frequently during conversations here at the office. Every time we discuss fundraising, online communications, or military outreach trips, we always ask “How can we reach out to young people?” This obsession with youth outreach is driven primarily by the simple reality that arms control’s political and financial supporters tend to be old. If we don’t want our profession to bleed to death right before our eyes, we must inspire and recruit a new generation of activists and scholars.

From personal experience, however, I can tell you that engagement with The Kids is very, very difficult. Let me explain.

True story: our Board of Directors reads in the dead tree New York Times that Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter are big things, right? So, like, let’s use those for youth outreach. Problem solved! Except that people don’t want to learn about nuclear weapons when they watch online videos. They want to watch stuff like this. And this. Probably not what our Board had in mind.

What should we do for outreach instead? In his article, Johan suggests both a college lecture tour by the Four Horsemen of the Anti-Apocalypse and increased recruitment of young people at arms control events. Those are great suggestions. I’ll add a third: job opportunities.

If you’re part of the rare breed coming out of college – aka interested in and vaguely familiar with security/nonproliferation/arms control – your options are extremely limited. You can shoot for the Carnegie Junior Fellows program, but good luck; it is ridiculously competitive and seems to prefer the nicely-pedigreed and internationalist set, which is kind of Carnegie’s MO in general. You can try for a Scoville Fellowship, which is how I got my start, but it’s the same problem: too many great people slip through the cracks because there simply isn’t enough money to fund all of the deserving candidates.

Going straight to grad school after undergrad is always an option. But then after grad school you must try to find a job when you posses limited professional work experience. In Washington, where paying entry-level jobs are scarce because there are so many people willing to work as unpaid interns, it’s tough to secure a gig with nothing but academic credentials.

This presents people with grad degrees (and a crushing amount of debt) who would really like to work in public service with a horrible choice: either take an unpaid internship or administrative position in public service, or go work for the dark side (defense contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton), pay off your school loans, and try to break into your preferred career later on.

Of course, working in the private sector changes your priorities (money!), so your good intentions may wither on the vine. Also, it is sometimes hard to move from the private sector to the public sector, particularly if you are a Democrat, because liberals prefer ascetic martyrs, not enterprising money-makers (aka Republicans).

Too few professional opportunities exist for young people in the arms control field. I can’t even tell you how many bright interns have come through our office desperately seeking a job in the field but have been forced to seek refuge outside of public service simply because they needed to pay the bills. If we are going to try and inspire The Kids in the ways Johan suggests, we should also create professional opportunities for The Kids once they become inspired.

Update: I’ve gotten some good feedback on this post. FYI, I wasn’t trying to hate on Kids, Carnegie, or Booz. Particularly with Carnegie, my intention was only to riff on their self-anointed “global think tank” slogan and all that.

I’ve gotten responses from a few people who are actually in the situation I described and looking for work in the field. For those people, here are some resources:

1. Email me at tsharp@clw.org and I’d be happy to add you to the jobs list I operate. I’ve currently got around 60 subscribers, and I’d say I circulate between 5-15 positions per week. I also pre-screen the jobs so almost everything I send out is D.C.-based, progressive/centrist, entry/mid-level, and (typically) defense or foreign policy related. No spam if I can help it.

2. NTI has a great internships and fellowships list.

3. Brad Traverse is amazing – I find a lot of the vacancies for my list on here. Five bucks a month (after $15 registration) but totally worth it.

4. The Foreign Policy Association job board is good, too.

tags Nukes on a Blog (all tags)


Display:

Arms control and nonpro are boring

OK, that headline is an exaggeration, but let's face it: arms control ain't exactly a happening field. Sure, the US and Russia have revived arms control talks, but this issue, red hot during the Cold War, now competes with a raft of other issues that capture a far greater share of the next generation's attention span: climate change, China's rise, the ever-smoldering Middle East, the two wars the U.S. is currently fighting, the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa, Darfur, and so on.

I would even argue that as fields of scholarly and policy inquiry go, arms control and nonproliferation are rather mature. We more or less already know what the nonproliferation playbook is for dealing with proliferation issues and arms control: engagement, containment, deterrence, and so forth. The specific details vary by region - North Korea in East Asia; Iran in the Middle East; nth country in its unique geopolitical and regional context. The regional dimension is where the real action is, and where the main opportunities for innovation and creativity lie, not in arms control and nonpro per se.

In addition to the fields' maturity, I would also describe them as conservative (in the apolitical sense). The leading voices in the field today have been at it for 15-20 years or more, and have largely fought the same battles over and over again, particularly with respect to arms control. The left is dominated primarily by nuclear abolitionists who cut their teeth back in the 1980s, while the right is dominated by post-arms control/anti-treaty Jesse Helms proteges. This community has been fighting the same theological battles since the Reagan administration. Witness the results of the Strategic Posture Commission.

Simply put, this is not an exciting field - and I say this as someone who works these issues. Sure, there are occasional crises, but at this point its more akin to routine maintenance than inventing new technologies.

Initiative

What should we do for outreach instead? In his article, Johan suggests both a college lecture tour by the Four Horsemen of the Anti-Apocalypse and increased recruitment of young people at arms control events. Those are great suggestions. I’ll add a third: job opportunities.

The lack of job opportunities, as we've discussed many times, is a chicken/egg problem that appears to be unsolvable.

However, I'd argue that the Four Statesmen are an opportunity for current young professionals working in arms control to "crack this egg" (high John!) by going outside the framework of board members and foundations.

So, are the young professionals at the Center and Council going to seize this opportunity?  A joint letter addressed to George Shultz, William Perry, Henry Kissinger and Sam Nunn from under-30 arms control professionals urging them to take on a multi-year tour to do as Bergenäs suggests could be an incredible catalyst.

Tell the statesmen what you want to do, how you will support their efforts, and why it's necessary that they, in particular, do their part.  I think they would be impressed and be willing to entertain a proposal if they received a letter signed by 50 young professionals (under 30 years old) currently in the field; not current heads of organizations or foundations.

It's an opportunity that can't be passed up.

An Arms Control Career

Bravo for highlighting the challenges of establishing a career in the scintillating field of arms control and nonproliferation.  Although I have been bouncing around the field for nearly 18 years, the experience back then is fresh in my mind and, unfortunately, it hasn't gotten any better.  Part of that has been that arms control has been out of vogue for the last 8 years or so, so jobs have been equally scarce.

I am now involved with a number of students at the Georgetown School of Foreign Service and have been trying to entice them to enter the field.  But, as you rightly point out, the options are not great.  I myself had to opt for working for the "dark side" in order to get my feet wet and to accrue useful experience.  Even now, as a mid-level professional, the options can be somewhat limited.

Great article Travis

Couldn't agree more. Its unfortunate to see how few of the people I know share more than a passing interest in this area.

The jobs part is also spot on. I, myself, am having to take a very roundabout path where I hope to break into the nuclear work only after I've paid my dues working for a year or more on other DOD issues.

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account by clicking right here. It's quick and free.

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

US weapons for future include key relics of the past
The Associated Press' Robert Burns wrote an article entitled "US weapons for future include key relics of the past" that features the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation's Laicie Olson discussing the 2013 Defense Budget....

Pentagon Budget: Forced To Diet On Only $613 Billion
The Associated Press' Robert Burns wrote an article entitled "US weapons for future include key relics of the past" that features the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation's Laicie Olson discussing the 2013 Defense Budget....

Are ambitious Life Extension Programs on Hold?
The B61 life extension program has come under increasing scrutiny. And for good reason writes Nickolas Roth in this new analysis....

Missile Defense Intercepts in Space: A problem not solved
A recent report by the Defense Science Board concludes that U.S. missile defenses are still unable to discriminate between an incoming missile and decoys or countermeasures designed to confound the system, writes Lt. Gen. Robert Gard (USA, ret.) in this n...

UNSCR 1540 & the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit: A View From Seoul
The Republic of Korea (ROK) has been and remains a staunch supporter of the global nonproliferation regime as it borders a grave security threat and proliferator of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). With the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit just months away,...