Print Print this article Email Email this article Link Trackback

QDR Embraces Reduced Role for Nukes in U.S. Strategy

Travis | Jan 30, 2010 | there are 0 comments 0

The new 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review has leaked out. I just gave it a pretty good read through. Here’s my quick cut analysis on nuclear weapons issues.

The QDR states that “new, tailored, regional deterrence architectures” and “new capabilities” will “make possible a reduced role for nuclear weapons in our national security strategy.” It embraces the concept of minimum deterrence, endorsing the goal of “a safe, secure, and effective nuclear arsenal at the lowest levels consistent with U.S. and allied interests.”

Yet the QDR does not discount the dangers and uncertainties ahead. It states:

Until such time as the Administration’s goal of a world free of nuclear weapons is achieved, nuclear capabilities will be maintained as a core mission for the Department of Defense. We will maintain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear arsenal to deter attack on the United States, and on our allies and partners.

Moreover:

Even as we strive to prevent proliferation, we must take steps to hedge against its possibility. Accordingly, DoD will continue to enhance U.S. capabilities for deterring and preventing the use of nuclear weapons and their means of delivery. In addition, the United States, its allies, and its partners will undertake consultations on policies and postures to prevent proliferation and credibly deter aggression.

The QDR tags the collapse of a WMD-armed state as a major concern for the United States. Such a scenario “could lead to rapid proliferation of WMD material, weapons, and technology, and could quickly become a global crisis posing a direct physical threat to the United States and all other nations,” the report concludes.

There is a big, big role for the nuclear weapons laboratories in the new QDR. In order to prevent WMD terrorism, the QDR calls on the United States to:

Establish a Joint Task Force Elimination Headquarters to plan, train, and execute WMD-elimination operations

Research countermeasures and defense to nontraditional agents

Enhance nuclear forensics

Secure vulnerable nuclear materials

Expand the biological threat reduction program

Develop new verification technologies

The labs will be critical in achieving all of these objectives.

tags Nukes on a Blog, Nuclear Posture Review (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account by clicking right here. It's quick and free.

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

Lips and Teeth
If it is true that North Korea’s WMD programs are being funded principally from illicit arms sales, then it is imperative that China take its UN Security Council sanctions obligations more seriously. In this new analysis, Chad O'Caroll questions whether t...

FY 2011 Threat Reduction and Nonproliferation Funding
In his historic Prague speech on nuclear weapons, President Obama pledged that the United States would lead “a new international effort to secure all vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years.” While last year's budget request was wel...

The Obama disarmament paradox: A rebuttal
Greg Mello's recent Bulletin article "The Obama Disarmament Paradox" distorts the Obama administration's nuclear agenda by making unjustified assumptions that discredit President Barack Obama's historic commitment to seek a nuclear-weapon-free w...

Fact Sheet: 2010 Nuclear Posture Review
The Nuclear Posture Review is scheduled for release sometime in March or April 2010. The review will set U.S. nuclear weapons policy for the next five to ten years and influence the implementation of President Obama's far-reaching agenda to reduce the rol...

John Isaacs vs. Baker Spring on Nuclear Reductions
On February 16, 2010, Center Executive Director John Isaacs debated Baker Spring, a research fellow in national security policy at the Heritage Foundation, on the topic of nuclear reductions as part of a live debate series conducted by the Project on Nucl...