Print Print this article Email Email this article Link Trackback

Administration Official on START Hush Money

Travis | Feb 03, 2010 | there are 0 comments 0

The National Nuclear Security Administration is slated to receive $11.2 billion in fiscal year 2011, a 13.4 percent increase over the current fiscal year. Undersecretary Tauscher said the increase will make a "very crucial investment" in the new Stockpile Management program. Vice President Biden said the increase “reverses this decline [in nuclear laboratories and facilities] and enables us to implement the president's nuclear-security agenda.” Hell, even NNSA framed the increase as part of “implementing the nuclear security agenda President Obama outlined in his Prague speech.”

NNSA is definitely all about the Prague.

Notice that nobody said what we all know: the NNSA budget increase is hush money; or, as KReif put it, proof that the Obama administration “views increased funding for the nuclear enterprise as a necessary step to secure Republican support for a new arms control agreement and the CTBT.” Perhaps “retainer fee” sounds less gangster?

Leave it to a number cruncher to cut through the BS. In response to a question about the cost of New START implementation at his budget briefing Monday, DOD Comptroller Robert Hale said “the adds to the budget of the National Nuclear Security Administration…will improve nuclear infrastructure in a variety of ways and – and we think that is an important step toward START ratification.”

I’m glad we’re all on the same page now.

UPDATE 2/4: I didn't see it before posting, but Jeffrey Lewis takes up this same issue over at ACW.

tags Nukes on a Blog, New START, START, Congress (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account by clicking right here. It's quick and free.

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

Growth in U.S. Defense Spending Since 2001
The Pentagon's budget has increased dramatically since 2001. In inflation-adjusted dollars, the total defense budget has grown from $432 billion in FY01 to $720 billion in FY11, a real increase of approximately 67 percent. The Pentagon’s base budget, whic...

Lips and Teeth
If it is true that North Korea’s WMD programs are being funded principally from illicit arms sales, then it is imperative that China take its UN Security Council sanctions obligations more seriously. In this new analysis, Chad O'Caroll questions whether t...

FY 2011 Threat Reduction and Nonproliferation Funding
In his historic Prague speech on nuclear weapons, President Obama pledged that the United States would lead “a new international effort to secure all vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years.” While last year's budget request was wel...

The Obama disarmament paradox: A rebuttal
Greg Mello's recent Bulletin article "The Obama Disarmament Paradox" distorts the Obama administration's nuclear agenda by making unjustified assumptions that discredit President Barack Obama's historic commitment to seek a nuclear-weapon-free w...

Fact Sheet: 2010 Nuclear Posture Review
The Nuclear Posture Review is scheduled for release sometime in March or April 2010. The review will set U.S. nuclear weapons policy for the next five to ten years and influence the implementation of President Obama's far-reaching agenda to reduce the rol...