Print Print this article Email Email this article Link Trackback

Nukes on a BlogNukes on a Blog

Are Ambitious Life Extension Programs on Hold?

Nickolas Roth | Jan 26, 2012 | there are 0 comments 0
A B61 bomb in Europe

A B61 bomb in Europe

I recently wrote an analysis on the future of the proposed life extension program for the B61 gravity bomb.

It argues, "Congress provided the full $233 million NNSA requested for the B61 life extension program in FY 2012. However, when you read the fine print, it is less clear how Congress will respond to future funding requests. According to the Conference Report for H.R. 2055, the legislation which funds the government for FY 2012, including NNSA, Congress withheld $134 million until “NNSA submits to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations the outcome of the Phase 6.2/2A design definition and cost study.

The results of this study, as well as other stringent reporting requirements mandated by Congress, are likely to present insurmountable hurdles to NNSA’s plan to move forward with the most ambitious option for the B61 LEP. The current budget environment is no doubt also a key driver of the need to reevalutate the objectives of the program, but a rethinking of the goals of the planned refurbishment would be necessary even in better economic times."

You can read the entire piece here.

tags Nukes on a Blog, budget, NNSA, tactical nuclear weapons (all tags)


Are Ambitious Life Extension Programs on Hold? | 0 Comments | Post a Comment
Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account by clicking right here. It's quick and free.

About This Blog

Forgot your password?

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

The Dawn of Nuclear Sanity?
There are signs that nuclear sanity is slowly gaining a foothold. Proposals are being considered by the Obama Administration that could pave the way for deep cuts in the number of U.S. nuclear weapons....

Rep. Turner vs. the Budget Control Act: More Nukes is Good Nukes
Rep. Michael Turner (R-OH) argues that the FY 2013 budget request does not provide enough money for the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) nuclear weapons programs. But not only did Turner lose this funding battle when Congress passed the B...

BRAC: The Next Steps for the Administration and Congress
The Pentagon is proposing to pursue two new base realignment and closure rounds in the coming years writes Senior Science Fellow Phil Coyle. But many questions remain....

Multibillion Los Alamos Project Threatened
John Fleck of the The Albuquerque Journal wrote a piece entitled "Multibillion Los Alamos Project Threatened" quoting Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation's Kingston Reif on the Los Alamos Laboratory's most expensive project in New Mexi...

The Case Against Increasing Plutonium Pit Production Capacity
In this new analysis Policy Fellow Nickolas Roth explains the origins and purpose of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility (CMRR-NF), its significance in terms of U.S. nuclear strategy, and potential consequences....