Joint Investigation Report On the Cheonan Attack
Duyeon | Sep 14, 2010 |The South Korean Defense Ministry has released a multinational investigation report on the Cheonan attack. You can read the report here at the Center's website.
China Proposes Resuming Six-Party Talks
Duyeon | Aug 27, 2010 |Chinese envoy Wu Dawei met with his South Korean counterpart in Seoul on August 26th to discuss the resumption of the six-party nuclear talks on North Korea's nuclear disarmament. But the meeting merely reaffirmed that the gap in their perception is still wide among the parties.
Wu reportedly proposed resuming nuclear negotiations in three phases, according to South Korean media:
1. Hold U.S.-North Korea direct talks
2.Hold unofficial, preliminary six-party talks privately behind closed doors
3. Hold official six-party talks
Wu reportedly said Beijing and Pyongyang have agreed on this method, and China is now trying to convince Seoul and later Tokyo, Washington and Russia to accept the plan. The Chinese envoy’s trip coincided with that of former U.S. President Jimmy Carter’s North Korea visit and North Korean leader Kim Jong-il’s China tour.
Reaction to the Proposal?
Seoul and Washington have maintained that Pyongyang must take responsibility over sinking the Cheonan before resuming six-way negotiations. Many observers believe that Pyongyang is trying to avoid responsibility with China’s help by dangling the possibility of resuming nuclear talks.
Beijing’s handling of the Cheonan incident has upset the other members of the six-party talks (minus Russia). So it may not be easy for China, the chair of the six-party talks, to coax Seoul, Washington and Tokyo. It remains to be seen what card Beijing plays to win the others over.
IF Pyongyang does have the will to denuclearize and proves this with concrete actions, then it will be difficult for Seoul and Washington to endlessly demand an apology before resuming the six-party talks.
The Gap: Still Wide
The problem, which has been so since the first nuclear crisis, is the wide gap in perception between the two sides. On one side, Pyongyang continues to deny its involvement in Cheonan, insist on the lifting of sanctions and insist on signing a peace treaty before denuclearization. On the other side, Washington, Seoul and Tokyo demand denuclearization steps first.
South Korea, the U.S. and Japan are unified in their policy and approach toward North Korea, which has been a rare phenomenon in the past. On the other side is China and North Korea. It is unclear what hidden cards will be played to break the current impasse.
Dangerous Developments in the Koreas
Tad Farrell | May 26, 2010 |The international team investigating the sinking of the Cheonan released its report last week, alleging North Korean responsibility for the attack. With the outcome of the investigation widely accepted by the international community, condemnation of Pyongyang has been nearly universal. As I explained in last week’s analysis, both South Korea and its allies have few avenues to reprimand the DPRK. Nonetheless, talk of U.N sanctions and the resumption of South Korea’s psychological warfare campaign has infuriated Pyongyang, which has threatened to retaliate with ‘a sacred war involving the whole nation’, using an ‘indiscriminate punishment of our style’. While this isn’t the first time North Korea has threatened to respond with war or even use nuclear weapons, its release in the context of the Cheonan incident must not be dismissed lightly – especially given signs that Kim Jong Il has instructed the DPRK military to get ready for combat.
Given the current uncertainties surrounding succession, Kim Jong-Il will not want to look weak to the DPRK military – the group holding the most significant power broker in North Korea. By not following through on at least some of the type of actions detailed in North Korea’s warnings, Kim could risk being seen as ineffectual – potentially causing problems for the planned succession to his son Kim Jong-Eun. Kim’s leadership over the coming days and weeks will thus be informed by this context. Similarly, Lee Myung Bak has stressed that South Korea ‘will not tolerate any provocative act by the North and will maintain the principle of proactive deterrence’. He too will be under pressure to show strong leadership, especially in advance of the June 2, 2010 local elections in South Korea. In this context, it seems there are several potential flashpoints that could lead to escalation.
6 Party Talks and the sinking of The Cheonan
Tad Farrell | May 18, 2010 |Kim Jong Il’s declaration last week that he was willing to ‘provide favorable conditions for the resumption of the Six-Party Talks’ marked a positive change in tone from North Korea’s previous insistence on a peace treaty with the U.S. as a precondition to resuming negotiations. However, the pledge comes just six weeks after the deadly sinking of a South Korean navy vessel, the Cheonan - a catastrophe that Seoul appears set to formally accuse North Korea this week of.
While it’s unclear if the torpedo rumored to have sunk the Cheonan was actually launched by the order of Kim Jong Il, both the U.S and South Korea have made it clear that there will be no resumption of nuclear talks until the case is resolved. And until a response is decided upon and implemented, engagement of any sort will remain out of the question.
While North Korea denied attacking the Cheonan, sources within both the U.S and South Korean Governments have continued to insinuate that Pyongyang is to blame. Suggestions that a key KPA General was promoted at the time of the sinking, and that a rumor of responsibility has been ‘proudly’ circulating North Korea, further call into question Pyongyang’s assertion of innocence. Other indicators of North Korean culpability include the fact that the ship sunk so close to the disputed Northern Limit Line and the traces of the powerful explosive ‘RDX’ recently identified at the scene. Despite all this, there has still been no official confirmation of what seems to be crystal clear – a North Korean torpedo sunk the Cheonan…



