Cut public spending or forgo nuclear weapons?
Tad | May 03, 2010 |
0 
According to new analysis from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, should all three of Britain’s main political parties meet the budget commitments detailed in their election manifestos, then the UK looks set to face the biggest public spending cuts in over a generation. The report suggests that Labour and the Liberal Democrats will have to make cuts on a scale not seen since the 1970s, when Prime Minister Jim Callaghan’s government was forced to turn to the International Monetary Fund for help in propping up the country.
Nukes on a Blog, UK, Trident, tax (all tags)
'Get Real Nick, Get Real!'
Tad | Apr 22, 2010 | 0 
Get Real Nick!
Gordon Brown's response to Liberal Democrat candidate Nick Clegg's suggestion that the UK should review its like-for-like renewal of Trident, especially in light of President Obama's view that terrorists with nuclear material are the number one risk to international security:
'Get Real Nick, Get Real!' What would we do if we were threatened by Iran or North Korea?'
Nukes on a Blog, Trident, UK, North Korea, Iran Watch (all tags)
Trident Uncertainties
Tad | Mar 08, 2010 | 0 
The UK's "Vanguard" class SSBN
A 2006 MOD White Paper said that the UK’s current fleet of Trident ballistic missile submarines would have to be retired in the early 2020s, estimating that it would take around 17 years to design, manufacture, and commission the replacement boomers. After a controversial vote in the House of Commons in 2007, it looked certain that the UK would replace its Vanguard class submarines as a key part of an extension plan to its at-sea ‘Trident’ nuclear deterrent.
Having devoted £7.7 billion in October 2007 for research and design in the initial ‘Concept Phase’ of the replacement program, the UK Government was scheduled to make ‘Initial Gate’ decisions as early as September 2009. These decisions would have kicked off a series of technical assessments and design work, committing Prime Minister Gordon Brown to pay out some 15% of the estimated £15-20 billion procurement costs for the new submarine.
In July 2009, the Government decided to delay the design contract until 2010. In January 2010, it was reported that the Government had postponed making its ‘Initial Gate’ decisions indefinitely, allegedly due to difficulties in agreeing on the type of nuclear reactors needed to power the future submarines. However, the timing of the announcement casts doubt on the claim that the delay is purely technical in nature. And as the Vanguard retirement clock continues to tick, suggestions of ‘indefinite’ delays call into question the Government’s commitment to the ‘urgent’ nature of the replacement program, as depicted in the White Paper timetable…
Nukes on a Blog, Trident, UK, nuclear, D5, Vanguard Submarines (all tags)
