Day 1: Inter-Korean Preparatory Military Talks

Duyeon Kim | Feb 08, 2011 | there are 1 comments 1
Col. Moon Sang-gyun (R) of South Korea shakes hands with Col. Ri Son-kwon of North Korea before starting preliminary military talks on Feb. 8. (Yonhap)

Col. Moon Sang-gyun (R) of South Korea shakes hands with Col. Ri Son-kwon of North Korea before starting preliminary military talks on Feb. 8. (Yonhap)

Nothing much has happened on Day 1 of inter-Korean working-level military talks, but I thought I might update everyone on what's happened so far:

- The talks are being held on the South Korean side of the border truce village of Panmunjeom among colonel-level officials.

  • The plan is to hold preparatory talks before higher-level military talks in the future.
  • The Feb. 8th talks reportedly lasted over nine hours and ended without an agreement on the agenda and rank of the officials for the envisioned higher-level military meeting.
  • South Korea's opening position: The Cheonan sinking and Yeonpyeong Island shelling must be discussed at the higher-level military talks. The current preparatory meeting would gauge Pyongyang's sincerity in taking responsibility for its actions while preventing further provocations.
  • North Korea's opening position: Pyongyang claims that discussing the Cheonan and Yeonpyeong Island incidents exclusively is like rejecting higher-level military talks. It also wants to deal with these two issues simultaneously with establishing mutual trust.
  • The two Koreas will meet again on February 9th at 10:00 a.m. (KST) for day 2 of talks.

Read more

tags South Korea, North Korea, military talks, Nukes on a Blog (all tags)

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

Remarks at Event on Tightening the Nuclear Nonproliferation Rules
Remarks by Kingston Reif on strengthening US nonproliferation rules in nuclear cooperation agreements with other countries....

House Armed Services Committee Gone Wild -- Again
If you thought last year’s House version of the defense bill was bad, this year’s iteration is even more extreme writes Kingston Reif....

The Heritage Foundation’s Missile Defense Fantasies
The Heritage Foundation's most recent ode to missile defense predictably misses the mark, writes intern Matthew Fargo....

Senate and House Appropriators Increase Funding for Nuclear Terrorism Prevention Programs
Senate and House appropriators deserve credit for prioritizing core nuclear material security and nonproliferation programs in their versions of the FY 2013 Energy and Water bill, writes Kingston Reif in this new analysis....

Center Staff Members Briefing on Recent Congressional Action on National Security Issues
The week of April 23, the House and Senate approved their versions of the FY13 Energy and Water Appropriations Bills. Additionally, the mark up for the Defense Authorization Bill was also approved in subcommittee. Click here to hear three Center staff mem...