What the 2010 elections mean for national security issues
Bridget | Nov 29, 2010 |Center head honcho John Isaacs has a timely piece in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists today on the impact of the recent midterm elections on key nuclear and other top national security issues over the next two years. John writes:
While the campaign locked in politicians’ views on budget deficits and health care, there was minimal debate on national security issues. This could signal that there might be more latitude for negotiations on issues such as nuclear weapons reductions and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
For John’s full analysis on “What the 2010 elections mean for national security issues” click here.
Below are some highlights from the piece:

