Emma Lecavalier


Emma Lecavalier

My Blog Posts

See All: Comments | Blog Posts Showing 2 of 2
  • Enhancing U.S. Security Through Treaties
    08/16/2011 05:01:30 PM EST
    Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller spoke to the U.S. Strategic Command 2011 Deterrence Symposium on August 4, and her comments regarding progress on the New START treaty were encouraging. Gottemoeller stated that the Treaty, which entered into force on February 5, has been “very successful,” and she likened its implementation to a “fast moving train.” To date more then 1,000 notifications have been passed between Washington and Moscow, tracking movements and changes in the status of each country’s strategic offensive arms and delivery vehicles. Gottemoeller noted that U.S officials and their Russian counterparts have been “constantly in communication,” strengthening mutual understanding and confidence.
  • The Cost of Maintaining the Nuclear Status Quo
    06/27/2011 01:22:37 PM EST
    The group Global Zero recently released a report assessing nuclear weapons spending worldwide. Their findings indicate that over the next decade, governments will significantly increase their nuclear weapons spending, eventually surpassing $1 trillion over the next decade. While this figure is significant, it must also be taken with a grain of salt. First, the trillion dollar figure is what Global Zero calls the “full cost” of nuclear weapons, as opposed to the “core cost.” Core costs refer to "researching, developing, procuring, testing, operating, maintaining and upgrading the nuclear arsenal." Full costs are derived from a more holistic approach, including "unpaid/deferred environmental and health costs, missile defenses assigned to defend nuclear weapons, nuclear threat reduction, and incident management". The report’s figure for the core cost of nuclear weapons over the next decade rests at about $670 million, therefore falling short of the $1 trillion dollar figure. Another concern is that the report’s figures have a wide margin of error. Quantifying even broad defense spending for countries like Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea is problematic, and as such, speculating about their total nuclear spending is near impossible. Global Zero admits this, but fairly argues that these programs are “small enough that inaccuracies in estimates would have negligible effect on the general conclusion." At current levels, "the nine nuclear weapons countries are spending approximately one trillion dollars per decade." Methodological concerns aside, what the report succinctly expresses is that world-wide investment in nuclear weapons is greater than ever.

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

Remarks at Event on Tightening the Nuclear Nonproliferation Rules
Remarks by Kingston Reif on strengthening US nonproliferation rules in nuclear cooperation agreements with other countries....

House Armed Services Committee Gone Wild -- Again
If you thought last year’s House version of the defense bill was bad, this year’s iteration is even more extreme writes Kingston Reif....

The Heritage Foundation’s Missile Defense Fantasies
The Heritage Foundation's most recent ode to missile defense predictably misses the mark, writes intern Matthew Fargo....

Senate and House Appropriators Increase Funding for Nuclear Terrorism Prevention Programs
Senate and House appropriators deserve credit for prioritizing core nuclear material security and nonproliferation programs in their versions of the FY 2013 Energy and Water bill, writes Kingston Reif in this new analysis....

Center Staff Members Briefing on Recent Congressional Action on National Security Issues
The week of April 23, the House and Senate approved their versions of the FY13 Energy and Water Appropriations Bills. Additionally, the mark up for the Defense Authorization Bill was also approved in subcommittee. Click here to hear three Center staff mem...